That's an interesting question that touches on how we've historically associated certain qualities with men and women. While language evolves, the distinction between "handsome" and "beautiful" for men often boils down to the specific type of attractiveness being described and the historical connotations attached to those words.
Think of it this way:
* Handsome often emphasizes a strong, well-defined, and dignified appearance. It can relate to features like a strong jawline, broad shoulders, a well-proportioned physique, or a generally striking and pleasing appearance. There's often an element of maturity, strength, and sometimes even a ruggedness implied.
* Beautiful, on the other hand, has historically been more strongly associated with a softer, more delicate, and often more overtly "pretty" aesthetic. Think of smooth features, graceful lines, and a certain ethereal quality.
Historically, societal expectations and gender roles played a significant part in shaping these linguistic norms. Men were often valued for their strength, authority, and stoicism, and "handsome" aligned more closely with these ideals. Women, conversely, were often idealized for their gentleness and delicate features, making "beautiful" a more fitting descriptor in that context.
However, language isn't static! You absolutely can hear men described as beautiful, and it often conveys a slightly different nuance. It might suggest a more sensitive, perhaps even androgynous, or exceptionally aesthetically pleasing quality that transcends traditional masculine norms. Similarly, while less common, you might hear a woman described as handsome, perhaps highlighting her striking features or dignified presence.
Ultimately, while "handsome" is the more conventional term for men, the lines are blurring, and the most appropriate word often depends on the specific individual and the particular aspect of their attractiveness you want to emphasize.
